Close Menu

Calculate Your Savings With a 335

Gradient background from green to very dark blue with two white dehumidifiers peeking up from the bottom

Discover how much you could save with Quest.

When you combine the dollars associated with energy consumption, reduced air conditioning usage, and the consistent environment the filter compensation feature provides, our new dehumidifier is one of the most cost-effective units on the market. With our cost savings calculator, find out how much you can save by using Quest versus the competition.

1

How much does your energy cost?

2

How much water do you need to remove?

3

How much does the competing dehumidifier cost?

Quest 335

Machines/Room

4

Equipment Cost @ MSRP 4 × $5199.95

$ 4800

Vegetation Period (4 Weeks) 80F/60%, Filter 100%

$ 2400

Flower Period (7 Weeks) 75F/55%, Filter 50%

$ 1600

Flower Period (2 Weeks) 70F/50%, Filter 25%

$ 114

Operating Costs Per 3mo Grow Cycle

$ 4114

Yearly Costs

$ 16,457

× 5

Year 1 4 Grow Cycles

$ 16,457

Year 2 4 Grow Cycles

$ 16,457

Year 3 4 Grow Cycles

$ 16,457

Year 4 4 Grow Cycles

$ 16,457

Year 5 4 Grow Cycles

$ 16,457

Total Cost (5 Years) Equipment + Operating Cost

$ 123631

Competitor 320

Machines/Room

Additional competitor units may be needed to address total water removal at rated conditions due to ppd de-rated capacity.

Quest: 205 gal/day de-rated capacity.
Competitor: 190 gal/day de-rated capacity.

4

Equipment Cost @ MSRP 5 × $4954.75

$ 4800

Vegetation Period (4 Weeks)

Why does the competitor cost more?

1) Inferior efficiency at 80F/60%: Quest is 9.3, the competitor is 6.0.
2) No filter compensation technology to maintain airflow as filter life degrades.
3) Additional units needed to maintain conditions.

80F/60%, Filter 100%

$ 3304

Flower Period (7 Weeks)

Why does the competitor cost more?

1) Inferior efficiency at 75F/55%: Quest is 7.8, the competitor is 4.2.
2) No filter compensation technology to maintain airflow as filter life degrades.
3) Additional units needed to maintain conditions.

75F/55%, Filter 50%

$ 3177

Flower Period (2 Weeks)

Why does the competitor cost more?

1) Inferior efficiency at 70F/50%: Quest is 6.0, the competitor is 3.8.
2) No filter compensation technology to maintain airflow as filter life degrades.
3) Additional units needed to maintain conditions.

70F/50%, Filter 25%

$ 240

Operating Costs Per 3mo Grow Cycle

$ 4114

Yearly Costs

Electrical costs + cost of equipment (depreciated over 5 years).

$ 16,457

× 5

Year 1 4 Grow Cycles

$ 16,457

Year 2 4 Grow Cycles

$ 16,457

Year 3 4 Grow Cycles

$ 16,457

Year 4 4 Grow Cycles

$ 16,457

Year 5 4 Grow Cycles

$ 16,457

Total Cost (5 Years) Equipment + Operating Cost

$ 180012

Total Savings Over 5 Years

$ 56,381